The Impact of the Principle ‘Matters are Judged by TheirObjectives’ and the Sub-Principles Under It on CertainJurisprudential Rulings “.A Descriptive and Analytical Study

Jurisprudential rules are one of the scientific legacies that we have inherited from previous scholars. They regulate and categorize rulings within origins and branches, bringing together the scattered ones under one link, making it easier to understand these rules, and to attach everything new to their similarities and analogues. Among these rules is the rule of “affairs with their intentions.” This great rule, which its foundation is based on intention and the purpose of the person charged with the task. Rather, the entirety of assignment, reward, and punishment is closely tied to intentions and purposes. The research aims to explain this rule in detail, explaining its meaning, its evidence, the sections related to it, the rules that fall under it and their exceptions, and the impact of the rules through sub-applications and the opinions of scholars on them. It also answered some questions related to the rule, including : How to judge verbal and physical actions, the weighting of words and intentions when conflicting, the impact of intention in changing the judgment, and how to distinguish between habit and worship. In my research, I reached a number of findings that showed that all human actions and behaviors, both verbal and physical, differ in their results and their consequent legal rulings depending on the difference in human intent, intention, and motive of those actions and behaviors. This research proceeded according to the descriptive analytical inductive method in general, and therefore the induction came from the perspective of representation and not limitation; as I studied the rule from the special books related to the rules, so I presented the statements, opinions and issues from them .